E-governance in constitutional systems: Opportunities and challenges — a comparative study
Main Article Content
Abstract
E-governance has become a central instrument in the modernization of public administration, enhancing transparency, accountability, and efficiency in contemporary states. However, its implementation raises significant constitutional concerns, particularly with respect to the principle of legality, the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms, and the scope of judicial review over digital administrative decisions. This study aims to analyze e-governance from a comparative constitutional perspective by examining the constitutional framework governing it in Jordan and comparing it with selected European models, notably Germany and France, in light of relevant European legal instruments, including data protection regimes and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
The study adopts an analytical and comparative methodology to explore both the opportunities offered by e-governance—such as enhanced transparency, administrative efficiency, and democratic participation—and the constitutional challenges it presents, including privacy protection, automated decision-making, and the digital divide among citizens. The findings indicate that the successful implementation of e-governance in Jordan requires the development of a comprehensive constitutional framework encompassing digital rights, as well as the establishment of specialized judicial oversight mechanisms. Such development should draw on European experiences while adapting them to the national context to ensure the protection of fundamental rights and to achieve digital transformation within the framework of the rule of law.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
References
Abd Al-Basit, M. (2021). Constitutional rights and privacy in the digital transformation era. Amman: Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, pp. 112, 145, 150.
Abdelrahman, A., Awaisheh, S. M., Awaisheh, S. M. et al. (2026). Speaking—and Silencing—The Constitution: A Semiotic Analysis of Jordan’s Constitutional Court Judgments (2025). International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10462-5
Abdullah, M. (2021). Digital divide and e-governance in Jordan: Challenges and opportunities. Amman: Dar Al Fikr, p. 210.
Abdullah, Y. (2021). Digital divide and citizens’ right to access electronic services. Amman: Dar Al-Fikr Al-Academe, pp. 201, 210.
Abdulghani, I. H., Mohsin, B. M., & Hussein, A. M. (2025). The legal basis of the principle of legality in facing digital administration development. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 23(S5), 2956–2970. https://doi.org/10.52152/801691
Abu Samhadaneh, A., & Al-Rafai’e, A. (2023). The condition under which the insurer has the right to terminate the insurance contract by his own willingness according to the Jordanian legislation: its meaning and legitimacy. The Jordanian Journal of Law and Political Science, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.35682/jjlps.v14i4.373
Ahmed, H. A. (2025). Judicial review of the legality of digital administrative decisions in Iraq: Between traditional provisions and the requirements of digital transformation. Journal of the Iraqia University, 7(74), November 2025.
Al-Ajarmeh, K. (2022). E-Governance and constitutional challenges in Jordan. Amman: University of Jordan Press, pp. 45, 60, 65.
Al-Amayreh, A. (2020). Digital rights and constitutional protection in the era of electronic transformation. Amman: Dar Al-Fikr Al-Qanuni, pp. 78, 90, 96.
Alayaydeh, H. A., Awaisheh, S. M., Al-Taani, M., Al-Dabbas, N. A., Alqudah, A. M.-A., & Awaisheh, S. M. (2025). The Problem of Establishing Civil Liability for Harmful Effects of Smart Robots. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 15(4), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2025.IJISS.15.4.04
Alayaydeh, H. A., Al-Wreikat, E. I., Alrfoua, A. Y., Al-Kade, M. J., Khleifat, N. A., & Alkayid, H. M. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence systems in legal personality and civil liability. Relacoes Internacionais no Mundo Atual. https://doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v4i46.7955
Alhasan, T. K., & Awaisheh, S. M. (2024). The Right of Public Employees to Defend Disciplinary Penalties in Jordan. International Journal of Public Law and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPLAP.2024.137783
Alhrerat, K. A., Alnsour, T. M. Q., Almasarweh, S. I. M., Alqudah, A. M.-A., Awaisheh, S. M. A., & Awaisheh, S. M. (2025). Safeguarding Electronic Signatures in Jordan: Legal Foundations and Enforcement Challenges. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 15(4), 302–308. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2025.IJISS.15.4.34
Al-Kasassbeh, F. Y., Awaisheh, S. M., & Odeibat, M. A. (2024). Digital Human Rights in Jordanian Legislation and International Agreement. International Journal of Cyber Criminology. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4766803
Al-Khatib, S. (2019). Digital administration and governance principles in Arab constitutional systems. Amman: Modern Law Library, pp. 134, 140, 145, 158.
Al Khaldi, I., Khawaldeh, A. M., Alhusban, F. M., Khalaileh, L. A., Altarawneh, S. M., & Al-Wreikat, E. I. (2025). Arbitration in cyber security disputes: Sci-fi or future reality? Relacoes Internacionais no Mundo Atual, 4(50), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v4i50.7879
Alkhawaldeh, A., Al-Shaer, B., Alwreikat, E. I., & Al Wahshat, Z. M. (2025). Analysis of the influence of good governance on economic growth in Jordan from 2002 to 2022. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 20(4), 1469–1478. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.200410
Alrfoua, A. Y., Awaisheh, S. M. A., Al-Wreikat, E. I., Al-Khraisat, W. M. M., Awaisheh, S. M., & Abdelrahman, A. (2026). The Role of Administrative Regulatory Authorities in Protecting the Environmental Sustainability of Natural Resources. Scientific Culture, 12(1-1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11425133
Al-Shabatat, M. A. Z. (2021). Execution of constitutional court verdicts in achieving a constitutional rule of law in Indonesia. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(2), 1–6.
Al-Shabatat, M. A. Z. (2021a). Adopting a limited liability partnership for the legal profession in the partnership law: A critical review from Indonesia’s perspective. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(2), 1–17.
Al-Shabatat, M. A. Z. (2018). The concept of university governance and its impact on enhancing standards of transparency, accountability, and participation. Association of Arab Universities Journal for Research in Higher Education, 38(2).
Al-Shabatat, M. A. Z. (2025a). Legal controls of legislative drafting. Perinatal Journal, 33(1), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.57239/prn.25.03310058
Al-Shabatat, M. A. Z. (2025c). The right to privacy in the digital age. Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan Journal for Legal Studies, 6(3), 75.
Al-Wreikat, E. I., Al Ajarmeh, H. H., Khalaileh, L. A., Albalawee, N., & Altarawneh, S. M. (2025). Medical liability in plastic surgery. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine, 16(2), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15681454
Al-Zoubi, A. M. (2019). E-government and its impact on public administration. Amman, Jordan: Dar Al Maseerah.
Al-Zubi, J. K., Maaqqbeh, M., Awaisheh, S. M., & Mofleh. (2024). Progress and Challenges in the Legal Framework of Women’s Rights in Jordan. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19128
Alshehadeh, A. R., Al-Zaqeba, M., Qtaishat, A., Al-Khawaja, H., & Al-Wreikat, E. (2025). Digitalization and sustainable development goals: Enhancing electronic financial reports quality in banking. Data and Metadata, 4, 734. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025734
Awaisheh, S. M. (2023). Digital Justice in Jordan: The Role of Virtual Arbitration Sessions in Modernizing the Legal System. International Journal of Cyber Criminology. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4766609
Awaisheh, S. M. (2025a). From Paper to Pixels: The Legal Status and Challenges of Electronic Writing in Administrative Contracts—A Comparative Study. Electronic Government. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2025.144726
Awaisheh, S. M. A., Al-Abbadi, H. S., Al-Dabbas, N. A., Hmaidan, R., Al-Khalaileh, L., & Al-Tarawneh, A. S. (2025c). New Claims and Causes of Action before the Court of Appeal in Jordanian Civil Procedure. Journal of Human Security. https://doi.org/10.12924/johs2025.210108
Awaisheh, S. M., Alsaraireh, N., Alkasasbeh, A. A. M., & Odeibat, M. A. (2025d). The Extent to Which Recourse to Arbitration Is Permissible in the Settlement of Procurement Contract Disputes. Journal of Human Security. https://doi.org/10.12924/johs2025.210103
Awaisheh, S. M., Awaisheh, S. M., Abdelrahman, A., Al-Thnaibat, O. H. A. (2025f). Environmental governance and administrative judiciary in Jordan and France: A socio-legal comparative study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 20(12), 5491–5501. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.201238
Awaisheh, S. M., Odeibat, M. A., Althunibat, A. O., Hmaidan, R., Al-Zboon, M. S. M., Alamawi, M. A. M., & Alsalamat, M. A. M. (2025e). Protecting trade secrets arising from artificial intelligence in UAE and Jordanian legislation. Journal of Human Security. https://doi.org/10.12924/johs2025.210109
Awaisheh, S. M., & Al-Dabbas, N. A. (2024). The Dichotomy of Interests: A Comparative Analysis of Civil and Administrative Lawsuits in the Jordanian Legal System. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19108
Awaisheh, S. M., Alkhamaiseh, M. A., Al-Maagbeh, M. M., & Khalaileh, L. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Administrative Decision-Making. Journal of Human Security. https://doi.org/10.12924/johs2024.20114
Awaisheh, S., Al-Hassan, T., & Mansour, A. (2024). The Status of Digital Evidence in Administrative Litigation. Al-Balqa Journal for Research and Studies, 27(3), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.35875/pgdx2798
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.08.006
Brownsword, R. (2019a). Digital governance and the rule of law: Accountability in the age of algorithms. London: Routledge, pp. 67, 72, 75, 80.
Brownsword, R. (2019b). Law, regulation, and technology: Protecting fundamental rights in the digital age. Oxford University Press, pp. 67, 72, 75, 80.
CNIL. (2020). Annual report on personal data protection. Paris: Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés, pp. 12, 15. Retrieved from https://www.cnil.fr/en/publications
Constitution of Jordan. (1952/2011). Jordanian Constitution, Article 7. Retrieved from https://wipolex-res.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/jo/jo073en.html
De Hert, P., & Gutwirth, S. (2008a). Data protection in the information society: Balancing technology, law, and fundamental rights. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 8, 12, 15.
De Hert, P., & Gutwirth, S. (2008b). Regulating profiling in a democratic constitutional state. In M. Hildebrandt & S. Gutwirth (Eds.), Profiling the European citizen: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 15–16, 271–291). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4020-6914-7
European Commission. (2020a). E-Government and digital public services. Brussels: European Union.
European Commission. (2020b). White paper on artificial intelligence: A European approach to excellence and trust (p. 14). Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/white-paper-artificial-intelligence-european-approach-excellence-and-trust_en
European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L119, 1–88. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
German Federal Constitutional Court. (1983, December 15). Volkszählungsurteil [Decision on the constitutionality of the Census Act]. BVerfGE 65,1. Retrieved from https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volksz%C3%A4hlungsurteil, p. 41.
German Federal Ministry of the Interior. (2019). Digital administration in Germany. Berlin: Bundesministerium des Innern.
Gutwirth, S., & De Hert, P. (2008). Regulating profiling in a democratic constitutional state. In M. Hildebrandt & S. Gutwirth (Eds.), Profiling the European citizen: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 12–15). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4020-6914-7
Hoffmann, A. L., & Wong, P. (2024). Transparency and accountability in AI systems: Safeguarding wellbeing in the age of algorithmic decision making. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2024.1421273
Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
Kuner, C., Cate, F. H., Millard, C., & Svantesson, D. J. B. (2020). Handbook on data protection in humanitarian action (pp. 45–46). International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108630442
Nishat, K., Khurshid, H., & Naseeb, J. (2024). Access to technology as a human right: Legal implications of the global digital divide. Mayo Communication Journal, 1(1), 63–72.
OECD. (2020). Digital government index: 2019 results. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dgit-2019-en
Public Law Project. (2023). Automated public decision making and the need for regulation. LSE Public Policy Review. https://ppr.lse.ac.uk/articles/110
Scholl, H. J. (2005). E-government: A special case of ICT enabled business process change. In H. J. Scholl (Ed.), E-government: Information, technology, and transformation (pp. 35–48). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Suksi, M. (Ed.). (2023). The rule of law and automated decision making: Exploring fundamentals of algorithmic governance. Springer, p. 45.
Tomlinson, J., Sheridan, K., & Harkens, A. (2020). Judicial review evidence in the era of the digital state. Public Law, 2(4), 1–23.
United Nations. (2020). E-Government Survey 2020: Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development (p. 57). New York: UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2020
United Nations. (2022). E-Government Survey 2022: Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://publicadministration.un.org/en/Research/E-Government-Survey
Viswanath, L. (2025). Digital constitutionalism: Navigating governance in the technological era. Journal of Law and Legal Research Development, 2(1), 15–20. Retrieved from https://www.jllrd.com/index.php/journal/article/view/33
West, D. M. (2005). Digital government: Technology and public sector performance (pp. 1–20). Princeton University Press.
Yeung, K., & Harkens, A. (2023). How do “technical” design choices made when building algorithmic decision-making tools for criminal justice authorities create constitutional dangers? Public Law, 2023(April), 265–286.
Zarsky, T. (2016). The trouble with algorithmic decisions: An analytic road map to examine efficiency and fairness in automated and opaque decision making. Science, Technology & Human Values, 41(1), 118–132.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power (p. 72). Public Affairs.