From branding to authority: UNESCO heritage and the institutionalisation of breakfast culture in multi-ethnic Malaysia
Main Article Content
Abstract
The paper discusses the redefining role of the political and diplomatic agency of food in international cultural governance with reference to the 2024 UNESCO inscription of “Breakfast culture in Malaysia: dining experience in a multi-ethnic society”. Going beyond the conventional imagination of gastronomy as soft power, the article posits that UNESCO recognition shifts routine breakfast practices into an institutionalised cultural power. By conducting a qualitative discourse analysis of UNESCO nomination files, evaluation reports, and Malaysian policy statements, the research shows how banal practices such as eating nasi lemak or drinking teh tarik are formalised, legitimised, and elevated within a global heritage regime. The results suggest that such a breakfast culture is not simply a creation of tourism branding or gastronomic appeal, but rather a form of institutional identity grounded in procedural validity. The incorporation of everyday gastronomy into an international governance system will allow Malaysia to convey a message of multicultural coexistence, grounded in credibility and recognition, rather than merely serving as a promotional spectacle. This act is a big step towards cultural diplomacy, in which ordinary social relations are elevated to a stable diplomatic value through institutional certification.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
Adell, N., Bendix, R. F., Bortolotto, C., & Tauschek, M. (Eds.). (2015). Between imagined communities and communities of practice: Participation, territory and the making of heritage. Göttingen, Germany: Göttingen University Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.gup.191
Ahn, Y.-J., Nazirjonov, I., & Juraev, Z. (2025). Tourism, territory, and transition: Heritage spatialization in Uzbekistan. Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing, 11(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17610990
Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2007). Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regulation & Governance, 1(4), 347–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00021.x
Bortolotto, C. (2012). International policies of intangible cultural heritage. In B. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett & L. Smith (Eds.), Intangible heritage (pp. 269–286). London: Routledge. https://www.routledge.com
Bortolotto, C. (2012). Participatory heritage governance and intangible cultural heritage. In R. F. Bendix, A. Eggert, & A. Peselmann (Eds.), Heritage regimes and the state (pp. 97–111). Göttingen, Germany: Universitätsverlag Göttingen. Retrieved from https://univerlag.uni-goettingen.de/handle/3/isbn-978-3-86395-095-8
Bortolotto, C. (2021). Commercialization without over-commercialization: Normative conundrums across heritage rationalities. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(9), 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1858441
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, England: Longman.
Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
Hafstein, V. (2009). Intangible heritage as a list: from masterpieces to representation. Intangible Heritage. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203884973-10
Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage: Critical approaches. London, England: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108857
Hussin, H. (2018). Gastronomy, tourism, and the soft power of Malaysia. SAGE Open, 8(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018809211
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (2004). Intangible heritage as metacultural production. Museum International, 56(1–2), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00458.x
Kravchenko, A., Kyzymenko, I., & Husieva, N. (2025). Epistemology of traditions: Philosophical challenges in preserving intangible cultural heritage. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 13(4), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/4.2025.110
Labadi, S. (2013). UNESCO, cultural heritage, and outstanding universal value: Value-based analyses of the World Heritage and Intangible Cultural Heritage Conventions. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Meskell, L. (2018). A future in ruins: UNESCO, world heritage, and the dream of peace. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Mattern, J. B. (2005). Why “soft power” isn’t so soft: Representational force and the sociolinguistic construction of attraction in world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 583–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330031601
Nakano, R., & Zhu, Y. (2020). Heritage as soft power: Japan and China in international politics. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26(7), 869–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1845322
Nye, J. S., Jr. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
Nye, J. S., Jr. (2011). The future of power. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
Rockower, P. S. (2012). Recipes for gastrodiplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 8(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2012.17
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. London, England: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263
UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention
UNESCO. (2024). Breakfast culture in Malaysia: Dining experience in a multi-ethnic society (Nomination file No. 02113). Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from UNESCO Nomination File 02113
Weiss, M. L. (2020). The roots of resilience: Party machines and grassroots politics in Southeast Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Winter, T. (2015). Heritage diplomacy. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(10), 997–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2015.1041412