Governing legal chatbots: Ethics, professional responsibility and liability in comparative perspective

Main Article Content

Enas Qutieshat
Majed Al Adwan
Abdulla Alshibli
Yassine Chami
Maya Khater

Abstract

Client intake, information retrieval, document assembly, and litigation assistance, among other legal functions, have seen deployment of Artificial Intelligence legal chatbots in legal care delivery. With substantial legal efficiency and access to justice improvements, these tools also pose major legal, ethical, and liability risks. Unlike other legal technologies, legal chatbots lie at the crossroads of the practice of law, consumer protection and automation; oversight of which can have negative legal consequences. This work looks at the legal, ethical and liability issues of legal chatbots in the EU, the USA and the UK. It contends that the existing governance approaches are sub-optimal to the unique challenges posed in these chatbots. It demonstrates the EU is gravitating to a compliance-and-liability regime through the Artificial Intelligence Act and revised Product Liability Directive, whereas the US and UK have a predominantly self-regulating professional quartet, with tort, and consumer protection law. This paper advocates for ‘accountability by design’ which contemplates design, deployment, and practice of law responsibility principles through the lifecycle of a chatbot.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Qutieshat, E., Al Adwan, . M., Alshibli, A., Chami, . Y., & Khater, M. (2026). Governing legal chatbots: Ethics, professional responsibility and liability in comparative perspective. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.58256/ppfy4k96
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Enas Qutieshat, Sohar University, Sohar, Oman & Tashkent State University of Law, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.

Dr. Enas Qutieshat is an esteemed academic and legal scholar holding a Ph.D. in Law from the University of Aberdeen, UK. She currently serves as Dean of the Faculty of Law at Sohar University, Oman, where she leads curriculum development, accreditation processes, and innovative approaches to legal education. Previously, she served as Deputy Dean and Head of the Law Department at Philadelphia University, Jordan, gaining extensive experience in academic leadership and institutional management. Her research and professional contributions span public law, women’s rights, and the legal regulation of emerging technologies, with a strong commitment to advancing quality in higher education.

Majed Al Adwan, Sohar University, Sohar, Oman.

Dr. Majed Al Adwan is an Associate Professor of Administrative Law at the Faculty of Law, Sohar University. He holds a PhD in Administrative Law from the University of Jordan. He previously served as an Associate Professor at Taibah University (Saudi Arabia) and Amman Arab University (Jordan). His research interests include Administrative Judiciary, Administrative Law, Administrative Contracts, Financial Law, and Constitutional Law. His work has been published in peer-reviewed academic journals, with a focus on doctrinal and judicial analysis.

Abdulla Alshibli, Sohar University, Sohar, Oman

Dr. Abdulla Alshibl holds holds a PhD in Educational Psychology from Egypt and a PhD in Sharia and Judiciary from Malaysia. He had worked in various educational and governmental positions, the last being an expert in the Ministry of Education in the Sultanate of Oman. He then competed for the position of Senior Director in the Arab Organization for Education, Culture and Science. He is currently working as an Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Law, Sohar University. His interests lie in publishing in all legal sciences, and he has published numerous scientific papers.

Yassine Chami, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Dr. Yassine Chami is an Assistant Professor of Civil Procedure Law at Abu Dhabi University and an Associate Professor in Algeria. He previously served as Professor of Civil Procedure Law at the College of Law, Dhofar University in Oman, Director of the Economic Legislation Development Research Laboratory, and Editor of the European Journal of Middle Eastern Studies in Germany. His research encompasses comparative law, civil law and contract theory, artificial intelligence and law, legal ethics and professional responsibility, and jurisprudential legal analysis.

Maya Khater, United Arab Emirates University, Alain, United Arab Emirates.

Dr. Maya Khater is an Associate Professor of Public International Law at the College of Law, United Arab Emirates University (UAEU). She holds a PhD in Law from Damascus University in 2011. Throughout her career, she has held several academic and administrative positions, including Vice Dean for Admission, Registration, and Student Affairs, and Assistant Dean of the College. Dr. Maya has taught law courses in both Arabic and English. Her areas of expertise include Public International Law, Human Rights Law, International Humanitarian Law, Artificial Intelligence and Law, and International Environmental Law.

How to Cite

Qutieshat, E., Al Adwan, . M., Alshibli, A., Chami, . Y., & Khater, M. (2026). Governing legal chatbots: Ethics, professional responsibility and liability in comparative perspective. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.58256/ppfy4k96

Share

References

Abdelhalim, E. A., Anazodo, K., Gali, N., & Robson, K. (2024). A framework of diversity, equity, and inclusion safeguards for chatbots. Business Horizons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.03.003

Abou Adel, M. (2022). Towards an advanced interactive E-learning for the language. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), Special Issue on CALL, (8), 330-340. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call8.22

Aishwarya, S., Selvamurugan, C., Parthiban, K., Prabhakar, J., Raja, J., & Amrutha, V. J. (2025). The Evolution of Chatbots. Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics Book Series, 223–262. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9841-8.ch008

American Bar Association. (2020). Model rules of professional conduct: Rule 5.5—Unauthorized practice of law; multijurisdictional practice of law. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_5_5/

Bonardi, M., & Branting, L. K. (2025). Certifying Legal AI Assistants for Unrepresented Litigants: A Global Survey of Access to Civil Justice, Unauthorized Practice of Law, and AI. The Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.52214/stlr.v26i1.13336

Chami, Y., Imad, D., Khater, M., & Aoka, M. E. A. (2025). Abuse of rights: A comparative study between Mālikī jurisprudence and positive law. AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 25(2), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v25i2.44606

Chaudhary, H. R., & Hadi, M. U. (2025). Aura: An AI-Powered Legal Assistant for Enhancing Access to Justice in the UK Legal System. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.175632364.48017327/v1

Madhi, Y. E., & Mustafa, B. S. (2024). History of Chatbot from Past to Present. International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology, 08(11), 01–05. https://doi.org/10.47001/irjiet/2024.811001

Chauhan, D., Singh, M., Sharma, A., Narang, H. K., Vats, S., & Sharma, V. (2024). Development of a Legal Chatbot for Comprehensive User Support. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/apcit62007.2024.10673669

Curran, L. (2017). Lawyer Secondary Consultations: improving access to justice and human rights: reaching clients otherwise excluded through professional support in a multi-disciplinary practice. Journal of Social Inclusion, 8(1), 46–77. https://doi.org/10.36251/JOSI.117

Data Protection Act 2018, c. 12. (2018). legislation.gov.uk. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/contents/enacted

Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. (2025, July 24). Online Safety Act. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/online-safety-act

El-Erian, M., Imad, D., Sulaiman, S., Qutieshat, E., & Khater, M. (2026). The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing corporate governance and achieving sustainable development. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 9(1), 208–232. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-9.1-a000177

Eliot, L. (n.d.). Considering an Attorney Duty to Inform Clients about AI-Based Legal Usage. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3966726

European Council. (1985). Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on liability for defective products. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 210, 29–33. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1985/374/oj

European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act), Official Journal of the European Union L 2024/1689. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng

European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/2853 of the European Parliament and of the Council on liability for defective products. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/2853/oj

Federal Trade Commission. (n.d.). Federal Trade Commission Act. Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/statutes/federal-trade-commission-act

Fischel, D. R. (1998). Lawyers and Confidentiality. University of Chicago Law Review, 65(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600183

Fluet, C., & Mungan, M. C. (2017). The Signal-Tuning Function of Liability Regimes. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3028318

Fraser, H., & Suzor, N. (2025). Locating fault for AI harms: a systems theory of foreseeability, reasonable care and causal responsibility in the AI value chain. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/tdf2y_v1

Gunder, J. (n.d.). Rule 11 Is No Match for Generative AI. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4769448

Hamer, K. (2023). Legal Advice (pp. 785–798). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192883384.003.0052

Khater, M., Aboelazm, K. S., Imad, D., Chami, Y., & Aly, H. (2025). The role of assistive technology in reinforcing the rights of persons with disabilities to employment from a legal perspective. International Journal of Law and Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-04-2025-0151

Kowert, W. (2017). The Foreseeability of Human–Artificial Intelligence Interactions*. Texas Law Review, 96(1), 181. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P4-1968927814/the-foreseeability-of-human-artificial-intelligence

Legal AI Systems in the EU’s proposed Artificial Intelligence Act. (2022). https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/kpz5t

Madhi, Y. E., & Mustafa, B. S. (2024). History of Chatbot from Past to Present. International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology, 08(11), 01–05. https://doi.org/10.47001/irjiet/2024.811001

Mahajan, A. A., Bhor, S., Patil, R., Rane, S., & Reshim, P. (2025). Legal chatbot and document generator using ReFlaPsy. World Journal Of Advanced Research and Reviews, 26(1), 3356–3363. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.26.1.1370

Marshall, K. L. (2024). ‘Trust Me, I’m an Expert!’ 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394155767.ch15

McGuire, J. B., De Cremer, D., Hesselbarth, Y., De Schutter, L., Mai, K. M., & Van Hiel, A. (2023). The reputational and ethical consequences of deceptive chatbot use. Dental Science Reports, 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41692-3

Meszaros, J., & Ho, C. (2021). AI research and data protection: Can the same rules apply for commercial and academic research under the GDPR? Computer Law & Security Review, 41, 105532. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLSR.2021.105532

Misquitta, Z., Sawant, A. A., Shaikh, A. U., Patil, A. S., & Narkar, Prof. N. (2024). Law Chatbot. International Journal For Science Technology And Engineering, 12(5), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.61361

Necz, D. (2024). Rules over words: Regulation of chatbots in the legal market and ethical considerations. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 64(3), 472–485. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2023.00472

Necz, D. (2024). Rules over words: Regulation of chatbots in the legal market and ethical considerations. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 64(3), 472–485. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2023.00472

Nggilu, N. M., Chami, Y., & Khater, M. (2025). Constructing humanitarian-based law: A philosophical analysis of the philanthropic legal paradigm. Yustisia, 14(3), 283–311. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v14i3.98924

Ofcom. (2024, November 8). Open letter to UK online service providers regarding generative AI and chatbots. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/open-letter-to-uk-online-service-providers-regarding-generative-ai-and-chatbots

Qiqieh, S., Hussein, E., & Abou Adel, M. A. (2025). The impact of WhatsApp on first-year students’ transition to university life. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1552278. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1552278

Queudot, M., Charton, E., & Meurs, M.-J. (2020). Improving Access to Justice with Legal Chatbots. 3(3), 356–375. https://doi.org/10.3390/STATS3030023

Rajendran, R. K., V., A. I., T., M. P., Vetrivel, S. C., & N.R, W. B. (2024). The Role of AI in Enhancing Access to Justice and Legal Services. Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development Book Series, 139–162. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7205-0.ch008

Schwemer, S. F., Schwemer, S. F., Tomada, L., & Pasini, T. (2021). Legal AI Systems in the EU’s proposed Artificial Intelligence Act. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3871099

Shaikh, A. J., Mirza, Z., Parkar, F. J., Maaz, M., Ahmed, A., Qayyum, A., & Khan, A. R. (2024). Chat Kanoon: A Novel Approach to Legal Assistance in India. Journal of Electrical Systems. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.3000

Shears, P. (n.d.). The Consumer Protection Regulations in the UK: the Story So Far. https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2016007

Sitorus, S. (2018). Pendapat Hukum (Legal Opinion) dan Uji Kepatutan Dari Segi Hukum (Legal Due Diligence). 15(2), 166–178. http://e-jurnal.staisumatera-medan.ac.id/index.php/hikmah/article/download/38/35

Solicitors Regulation Authority. (2019). SRA standards and regulations: Code of conduct for solicitors, RELs and RFLs. https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/standards-regulations/code-conduct-solicitors/

State, Christiana; Chakrabarti, Preetha; Hughes, Dalton; Rippy, Sarah. Everyone's Talking AI, including the Federal Trade Commission: Key Takeaways from the FTC's 2023 AI Guidance. The Journal of Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Law, 6.‏

Szpyt, K. (2025). Civil Liability for Damages Caused by the Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by Lawyers in the Provision of Legal Services. Part II. Prawo Asekuracyjne, 2(123), 58–86. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0055.2326

UK Government. (n.d.). Data protection. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/data-protection

Uludağ, K. (2024). The Ethical Aspects of Chatbots and Beyond. Advances in Medical Technologies and Clinical Practice Book Series, 223–236. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3112-5.ch010

Walek, B., & Masar, J. (2013). Methodology for design of safe operating systems. Global Journal on Technology, 4(2).

Weaver, J. F. Helping AI to Comply with the Federal Trade Commission Act. The Journal of Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Law, 2.‏

Weinstein, S. (2025). What Does the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC). DoNotPay Enforcement Action Teach Us About AI Ethics and AI Legal Ethics. In XCIII Ethical Aspects of AI (pp. 95-105).‏

Wolfs, S. (2024). Objection! use of a.i.! The Maastricht Journal of Liberal Arts, 15. https://doi.org/10.26481/mjla.2024.v15.981

Zemčík, T. (2019). A Brief History of Chatbots. DEStech Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.12783/DTCSE/AICAE2019/31439

Zornoza Somolinos, A. (2022). La responsabilidad jurídica de los programadores por los daños causados por agentes autónomos. Actas de Las XXXVII Jornadas de Automática 7, 8 y 9 de Septiembre de 2016, Madrid. https://doi.org/10.17979/spudc.9788497498081.0425