Liminal strategies and the development of contemporary Ukrainian dramaturgy
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article explores the potential integration of liminal strategies into literary studies research, focusing on the stages of development in contemporary Ukrainian dramaturgy. The purpose of this study is to examine how the application of liminal strategies can enhance literary studies research, specifically within the context of contemporary Ukrainian dramaturgy. The methodology employed involves an analysis of various works and critical perspectives in the field, with a particular emphasis on identifying and understanding the liminal aspects and transitions present in the development of Ukrainian drama. The accent is made on the conceptual framework of "rites of passage" by A. van Gennep and V. Turner, any innovations in an individual's life and society require the navigation of three stages of transition – separation, liminality, and incorporation. Findings from this research indicate that integrating liminal strategies into literary studies research offers valuable insights and a richer understanding of the dynamics and transformations within contemporary Ukrainian dramaturgy. By examining the liminal phases of separation and incorporation in the works of Ukrainian playwrights, this study sheds light on the intricate processes of transition and the social and cultural implications associated with them. The practical implications of this research lie in the potential for scholars and researchers to employ liminal strategies as a conceptual framework for studying other literary traditions and exploring the transformative nature of artistic expression. This study contributes to expanding the methodological toolkit in literary studies, encouraging a deeper engagement with the liminal dimensions of literary works and their socio-cultural significance.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
Bell, C. M. (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and dimensions (p. 351). Oxford University Press, USA. https://voidnetwork.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Ritual.-Perspectives-and-Dimensions-by-Catherine-Bell.pdf
Bynum, C. W. (1990). Material continuity, personal survival, and the resurrection of the body: a scholastic discussion in its medieval and modern contexts. History of Religions, 30(1), 51-85.
Chernetsky, V. (2003). Postcolonialism, Russia and Ukraine. Ulbandus Review, 7, 32-62.
Crosby, J. (2009). Liminality and the Sacred: Discipline Building and Speaking with the Other. Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies, 5(1). http://liminalities.net/5-1/sacred.pdf
Dass, M. (2013). Beyond the threshold: Explorations of liminality in literature. A Journal of English Studies, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10131752.2013.783395
Flynn, M. (2022). Class Act: East-West: Youth Theatre and the Making of Meaning in Postrevolutionary Ukraine. TDR, 66(2), 191-210.
Freud, S. (1917). Mourning and melancholia. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, 14(1914-1916), 237-258.
Haleta, O. (2013). Literary CombiNation: Memory and space in contemporary Ukrainian anthologies. Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies, 5(2).
Hundorova, T. (2016). Ukrainian Euromaidan as Social and Cultural Performance. Revolution and War in Contemporary Ukraine: The Challenge of Change, 161-181.
Ingwersen, M. (2017). Towards a trickster science/fiction: complexifying boundaries with Neal Stephenson and Michel Serres. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 42(3), 255-268.
John, G. S. (Ed.). (2008). Victor Turner and contemporary cultural performance. Berghahn Series (p. 358). Berghahn Books. ISBN 1845454626, 9781845454623.
Johnston, P. A. (1996). Cybele and her companions on the northern littoral of the Black Sea. In Cybele, Attis and related cults (pp. 101-116). Brill.
Kraft, C. (2021). An Ecocritical Reading of the Marsh as a Liminal Space in Delia Owens's Where the Crawdads Sing. The Southern Quarterly, 58(3), 131-150.
Lincoln, B. (1981). Emerging from the chrysalis: Studies in rituals of women's initiation. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674248406
Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent social sciences, 5(1), 1653531.
Morrison, K. M. (2002). The solidarity of kin: Ethnohistory, religious studies, and the Algonkian-French religious encounter. SUNY series in Native American Religions (p. 243). SUNY Press. ISBN 0791454053, 9780791454053.
Nordin, I. G., & Holmsten, E. (Eds.). (2009). Liminal borderlands in Irish literature and culture (Vol. 9). Peter Lang.
Revakovych, M. (1987). Z mishka mandrivnyka: poezii [From the traveler's bag: poems] (p. 62). New-York, Publishing House of the New York Group.
Spariosu, M. I. (2013). Computational models of intercultural relations in Banat and Transylvania: theoretical and practical issues. Romanian journal of information science and technology, (2-3), 109−130. http://www.romjist.ro/content/pdf/01-spariosu.pdf
Spariosu, M. I. (2015). Exile and utopia as liminal play: A cultural-theoretical approach 1. In Philosophical Perspectives on Play (pp. 13-26). Routledge.
Turcan, R. (2001). The Gods of Ancient Rome: Religion in Everyday Life from Archaic to Imperial Times (p. 180). Taylor & Francis. ISBN 0415929741, 9780415929745.
Turner, V. (1977).The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure (p. 222). Ithaca, New York: Cornell Paperbacks Cornell University Press. https://monoskop.org/images/9/90/Turner_Victor_The_Ritual_Process_Structure_and_Anti-Structure.pdf
Ukrdramahub (n.d.). Portal suchasnoi ukrainskoi dramaturhii [Portal of modern Ukrainian drama]. https://ukrdramahub.org.ua/
Van Gennep, A. (1908). Totémisme et méthode comparative. Revue de l'histoire des religions, 34-76.
Van Gennep, A. (1960). The Rites of Passage. Chicago (p. 198). IL: University of Chicago Press.
Veselovska, H. (2019). Capabilities and Constraints of the Communicative Model in the Immersive Theatre. Art Studies Readings, (2), 250-257.
Veselovska, H. (2023) Tryhery suspilnoho spokoiu. Pokydky ta inshi piesy. Suchasna ukrainska dramaturhiia: zbirka. [Triggers of public peace. Dumpsters and other plays. Modern Ukrainian drama: a collection] Kharkiv. Folio. 383
Viljoen, H., & Van der Merwe, C. N. (Eds.). (2007). Beyond the threshold: explorations of liminality in literature (p. 272). Peter Lang.