Imperative forms in Imam Malik’s letter to Caliph Harun Al-Rashid: A linguistic study in semantic fields
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to examine the imperative (command) forms in Imam Malik’s letter to Harun Al-Rashid and classify them according to the semantic fields in which they appear. It seeks to answer a set of questions, such as: What are the most prominent semantic fields for the imperative forms in the letter? Did the commands appear only in the forms traditionally identified by linguists? Does prohibition carry the deep meaning of a command? What specific imperative forms did the sender employ in each field and what is their significance? How were these forms utilized throughout the letter, and does this style indicate the sender’s profound linguistic knowledge?
Methodology: The study is conducted within two frameworks. The theoretical framework provides a brief introduction to the author (Imam Malik), the recipient (Caliph Harun Al-Rashid), and the historical value of the letter, while also exploring the concepts and purposes of imperative forms in Arabic and semantic fields. The applied framework provides a detailed analysis of the most prominent semantic fields of the imperative forms found in the letter. The research demonstrates how these forms were employed in each field to highlight specific connotations, following descriptive and analytical methodologies. The study concludes by highlighting the most significant results.
Results: The study identifies the primary semantic fields within the letter, all of which belong to the broader and more comprehensive field of Islamic Teachings. The findings show that the sender demonstrated high linguistic skill through the strategic employment of these forms, resulting in a diverse range of imperative styles used by the author.
Conclusion: The use of imperative forms in numerous contexts had a clear impact on manifesting the intended meanings sought within each semantic field.
Objectives: This study aims to examine the imperative (command) forms in Imam Malik’s letter to Harun Al-Rashid and classify them according to the semantic fields in which they appear. It seeks to answer a set of questions, such as: What are the most prominent semantic fields for the imperative forms in the letter? Did the commands appear only in the forms traditionally identified by linguists? Does prohibition carry the deep meaning of a command? What specific imperative forms did the sender employ in each field and what is their significance? How were these forms utilized throughout the letter, and does this style indicate the sender’s profound linguistic knowledge?
Methodology: The study is conducted within two frameworks. The theoretical framework provides a brief introduction to the author (Imam Malik), the recipient (Caliph Harun Al-Rashid), and the historical value of the letter, while also exploring the concepts and purposes of imperative forms in Arabic and semantic fields. The applied framework provides a detailed analysis of the most prominent semantic fields of the imperative forms found in the letter. The research demonstrates how these forms were employed in each field to highlight specific connotations, following descriptive and analytical methodologies. The study concludes by highlighting the most significant results.
Results: The study identifies the primary semantic fields within the letter, all of which belong to the broader and more comprehensive field of Islamic Teachings. The findings show that the sender demonstrated high linguistic skill through the strategic employment of these forms, resulting in a diverse range of imperative styles used by the author.
Conclusion: The use of imperative forms in numerous contexts had a clear impact on manifesting the intended meanings sought within each semantic field.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
Abu-Rahme, M. O., Al-Hawawsheh, S. H., Meqdad, S. A., & Alhroot, M. (2025). The morphological reversion of intensive patterns in the poems of Al-Mutanabbi in praise of Sayf Al-Dawla Al-Hamdani. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(4), 1226-1232. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1504.21
Al-Aboud, J. (n.d.). Semantic field theory: An applied study according to the grammatical factor. Journal of the College of Arts, Al-Mustansiriya University, 97.
Al-Anbari, H. (2017). The significance of the matter according to linguists and fundamentalists. Al-Yamamah Printing and Publishing Office.
Al-Azhari, M. (2001). Refinement of the language (M. Awad, Ed.). Arab Heritage Revival House.
Al-Damen, H. (1989). Linguistics. Ministry of Higher Education.
Al-Farahidi, A. (1985). Al-Farahidi's work (F. Qabawa, Ed.). Al-Resala Foundation.
Al-Fayoumi, A. (n.d.). Al-Misbah Al-Munir fi Ghareeb Al-Sharh Al-Kabir. Scientific Library.
Al-Fayrouzabadi, M. (2005). The ocean dictionary. Al-Resala Foundation for Printing, Publishing and Distribution.
Al-Ghalayini, M. (1993). Jami' al-Durus al-Arabiyah (28th ed.). Modern Library.
Al-Hawawsha, S. H., Meqdad, S. A., & Aburahme, M. O. (2022). The semantic arrangement of antonyms in clear and ambiguous vocabulary in the Qur'an. Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 24(1), 140-176. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2022.0497
Almanasra, M., Alkhseilat, A., Haider, A. S., Abu Issa, H., Meqdad, S., & Khater, M. N. (2025). Judges' perspectives on the use of modern standard Arabic versus vernacular in court proceedings. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.58256/9vb1qg73
Al-Masry, A. (2009). Linguistic formation in prison poetry according to Abu Firas Al-Hamdani. Al-Aqsa University Journal, 13(1).
Al-Qali, A. (1975). Al-Bari' fi Al-Lughah (H. Al-Ta'an, Ed.; 1st ed.). Dar Al-Nahda.
Al-Qazwini, M. (n.d.). Clarification in the sciences of rhetoric (M. Khafaji, Ed.). Dar Al-Jeel.
Al-Razi, Z. (1999). Mukhtar al-Sahah (Y. Al-Sheikh, Ed.; 5th ed.). Modern Library.
Al-Sa'i, L. (2022). The theory of semantic fields: Its concept, foundations and transfer. Generation Journal of Intellectual Literary Studies, 77.
Al-Shammari, N. (2001). Formulas of the imperative in the Qur'an and Sunnah [Unpublished master's thesis]. Cairo University.
Alshamsi, A. J., Qpilat, N. M., & Almazaidah, I. (2024). Traces of narrative transformation in the Syrian novel after 2011. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 5(2), 104–128. https://doi.org/10.58256/9xdnv546
Al-Suyuti, A. (2004). History of the caliphs (H. Al-Demerdash, Ed.; 1st ed.). Nizar Mustafa al-Baz Library.
Al-Thunebat, S. A., Al-Masarwah, T. I., & Almazaedh, I. S. (2024). The duality of cohesion and coherence in Ibn Zurayq's poem "Do Not Reproach Him". International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 13(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v13i2.5036
Al-Zirakli, K. (2002). Al-A'lam (15th ed.). Dar Al-Ilm Lil-Millain.
Anis, I. (1976). The semantics of words. Anglo-Egyptian Library.
An-Naml, K. (1988). Al-Munajjid fi Al-Lughah (A. M. Omar, Ed.). Al-Alam Al-Kutub.
Attar, N. (2000). The command in Arabic: A grammatical and morphological study [Unpublished master's thesis]. Umm Al-Qura University.
Azouz, A. (2002). Heritage principles in the theory of semantic fields. Arab Writers Union.
Garmain, C., & Leblon, R. (1997). Semantics (T. Al-Huda Lushin, Trans.; 1st ed.). Qan Yunis University Publications.
Hassan, A. (n.d.). Al-Nahw Al-Wafi (3rd ed.). Dar Al-Maaref.
Ibn al-Hajib, J. (2010). Al-Kafiya fi Ilm al-Nahmu (S. Abdel-Azim, Ed.; 1st ed.). Library of Arts.
Ibn al-Nazim, B. (2000). Explanation of Ibn al-Nazim on the Alfiyyah of Ibn Malik (M. B. U. Al-Aswad, Ed.; 1st ed.). Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Ibn Duraid, A. (1987). Jamharat al-Lughah (R. Baalbaki, Ed.; 1st ed.). Dar al-Ilm Lil-Malayin.
Ibn Faris, A. (1986). Ibn Faris's Majmal al-Lughah (Z. Sultan, Ed.). Al-Resala Foundation.
Ibn Manzur, M. (1414). Lisan al-Arab. Dar Sader.
Ibn Yaish, A. (2001). Explanation of Al-Mufassal (E. Baaqoub, Ed.). Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah.
Ibrahim, A. M. A., Almazaedh, I. S., & Allawzi, A. K. (2024). Literary theory and its role in modern and contemporary criticism: A critical approach. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 5(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.58256/zebr1z41
Khater, M. N., Issa, H. A., Meqdad, S. A. A., & Al-Hawawsheh, S. (2026). The semiotics of threatening language in Jordanian courts: A forensic-linguistic analysis of criminal cases from 2023 to 2024. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 39(1), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10338-0
Khudair, B. (2017). Imam Ali's discourse strategies: A deliberative approach (1st ed.). Nahj Al-Balagha Science Foundation.
Maqdad, S., & Al-Shamali, N. (2023). The arabized and the intruder: A survey of Arabic linguists' efforts. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 6(4), e2023050. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2023050
Matloub, A. (1980). Arabic rhetorical methods: Eloquence, rhetoric, meanings (1st ed.). Publications Agency.
Meqdad, S. A., & Issa, H. M. A. (2024). Foundations for drafting an appeal petition in Jordanian courts. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 16(1), 377-387. https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.1.377.387
Meqdad, S. A. A. (2019a). The contextual of contemporary religious discourse in the visual media: A pragmatics reading. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 46(4), 135-146.
Meqdad, S. A. A., Albayyari, M. R., Abugharbiah, E. E., Terrisi, A., & Dello, A. M. (2025). The art of correspondence by Abdul Rahim Al-Baisani (The righteous arbiter). Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.58256/e7b06656
Meqdad, S. A., Abu-Rahme, M. O., Al-Hawawsheh, S. H., & Alrkep, A. S. (2024). The contextual spaces of the Arabic nouns al-fi'il, al-'amal and al-sun' in the Holy Quran: Implications and uses. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 51(3), 525-537. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i3.4328
Meqdad, S. A., Abu-Rahme, M. O., Al-Hawawsheh, S. H., & Al-Taher, M. A. (2022). The semantic connotation of contradictory contrast in the Noble Qur'an, represented in serr (concealment) and alan (announcement). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(7), 1410-1418. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1207.22
Meqdad, S. A. J. (2019b). The constraint of case (object complement) and the constraint of emphasis and their impact on identifying the meaning: A study of the term 'jami'an' (all) in the Glorious Koran. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 46(1), 263-280.
Meqdad, S. A. A., Issa, H. A., AbuGharbiah, E. E., Al Zaabi, T. A. S., & Al Riyami, A. H. A. (2026). Textual cohesion and procedural pragmatics in Arabic digital banking discourse: A pragmatic-linguistic way to samples from UAE banking applications. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 7(2).
https://doi.org/10.58256/sg4ntx11
Miqdad, S. A., Issa, H. M. A., & Alwerikat, N. M. (2022). Definition of the term 'the wound' in the Jordanian penal law. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(8), 1630-1633. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1208.20
Omar, A. (2008). Dictionary of the contemporary Arabic language. World of Books.
Safwat, A. (n.d.). Collection of Arab letters in the prosperous Arab ages. Scientific Library.
Shaheen, R. M. (2005). A study and investigation of the letter of Imam Malik bin Anas to the Commander of the Faithful Harun al-Rashid. Journal of the Islamic University: Sharia Studies Series, 13(2).
Tharshi, M. (2000). Text tools. Arab Union Publications.