Analytical review of contemporary speculative literature: Foresighting the future of health, energy, and economics within strategic pillars and the 2030 SDG framework
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article argues that contemporary speculative literature operates as a mode of cultural foresight through which writers test, complicate, and ethically evaluate possible futures of health, energy, and economics. Rather than treating speculative fiction as a crude predictive machine, I read it as a literary practice of scenario-making that reveals hidden interdependencies between bodily vulnerability, infrastructural power, and political economy. Situated at the intersection of English literary studies, speculative fiction studies, ecocriticism, medical humanities, energy humanities, and sustainability discourse, the essay examines how narrative form, temporality, metaphor, and world-building render the future thinkable at human scale while keeping structural forces in view. The discussion proceeds through three major clusters. First, it reads pandemic, biotechnological, and biopolitical narratives to show that speculative literature imagines health not merely as a medical condition but as a question of care, access, reproductive justice, disability, and institutional trust. Second, it turns to climate crisis, fossil-fuel dependence, extractivism, water stress, and renewable imaginaries to show how speculative texts make energy legible as culture, conflict, and planetary infrastructure. Third, it examines labor, automation, inequality, scarcity, and post-growth possibilities to demonstrate that the genre persistently turns economic abstraction into lived experience. Throughout, the article connects these literary futures to the strategic logics of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, especially SDGs 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 13. I conclude that contemporary speculative literature does not deliver policy blueprints, but it performs an equally important task: it trains ethical attention, widens political imagination, and offers narrative laboratories for more just and sustainable futures.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
Albert, M. J. (2024). Growth hegemony and post-growth futures: A complex hegemony approach. Review of International Studies, 50(5), 932–942. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210524000159
Arends, B. (2024). Seeing the Anthropocene through Montage. Environmental Humanities, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-11327300
Asayama, S., & Ishii, A. (2017). Selling stories of techno-optimism? The role of narratives on discursive construction of carbon capture and storage in the Japanese media. Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.010
Badia, L. (2022). Energy humanities. In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42681-1_12-1
Banik, N., & Padalkar, M. (2021). The spread of gig economy: Trends and effects. Foresight and STI Governance, 15(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2021.1.19.29
Banks, M. (2022). The unanticipated pleasures of the future: Degrowth, post-growth and popular cultural economies. New Formations, 107–108, 12–29. https://doi.org/10.3898/NewF:107-8.01.2022
Barrish, P. (2019). Speculative fiction and the political economy of healthcare: Chang-Rae Lee’s On Such a Full Sea. Journal of Medical Humanities, 40(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-018-9514-4
Brown, P. (2017). Narrative: An ontology, epistemology and methodology for pro-environmental psychology research. Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.006
Burgos-Mascarell, A., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Martínez-López, M. (2016). Dystopia deconstructed: Applying the triple helix model to a failed utopia. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1845–1850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.067
Bushell, S., Buisson, G. S., Workman, M., & Colley, T. (2017). Strategic narratives in climate change: Towards a unifying narrative to address the action gap on climate change. Energy Research & Social Science, 28, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.04.001
Cameron, R. P. (2015). Improve your thought experiments overnight with speculative fiction! Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 39(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/misp.12033
Castellano, K. (2018). Anthropomorphism in the Anthropocene. Environmental Humanities, 10(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-4385516
Castree, N. (2014). The Anthropocene and the environmental humanities: Extending the conversation. Environmental Humanities, 5(1), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615496
Chan, S. (2009). More than cautionary tales: The role of fiction in bioethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(7), 398–399. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.031252
Chrulew, M. (2016). Francis’s planetary practice. Environmental Humanities, 8(2), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3664351
Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41(6), 968–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014
Crownshaw, R. (2017). Speculative memory, the planetary and genre fiction. Textual Practice, 31(5), 887–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2017.1323484
De Matas, J. K. Z. (2022). The future of public health through science fiction. Humanities, 11(5), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/h11050127
De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2015). The epistemic value of speculative fiction. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 39(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/misp.12035
de Freitas, E., & Truman, S. E. (2020). New empiricisms in the Anthropocene: Thinking with speculative fiction about science and social inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420943643
Despret, V., & Chrulew, M. (2020). Traits. Environmental Humanities, 12(1), 186–189. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-8142286
Doherty, J., & Giordano, J. (2020). What we may learn – and need – from pandemic fiction. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 15(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-020-00089-0
Fahy, D. (2020). Energy humanities: Insights for environmental communication. Environmental Communication, 14(5), 712–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1758377
Friedrich, J., & Hendriks, A. (2024). Imagined futures in sustainability transitions: Towards diverse future-making. Futures, 164, 103502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2024.103502
Fukuda-Parr, S., & McNeill, D. (2019). Knowledge and politics in setting and measuring the SDGs: Introduction to special issue. Global Policy, 10(S1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12604
Garcia, A., & Mirra, N. (2023). Other suns: Designing for racial equity through speculative education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 32(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2023.2166764
Garduño García, C., & Gaziulusoy, İ. (2021). Designing future experiences of the everyday: Pointers for methodical expansion of sustainability transitions research. Futures, 127, 102702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102702
Gauthier, T. (2024). In the kingdom of the sick: Abjection, mutuality, and the afflicted in recent pandemic fiction. University of Toronto Quarterly, 93(4), 705–722. https://doi.org/10.3138/utq.93.04.09
Geels, F. W. (2005). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(6), 681–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014
Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
Goodbody, A., & Smith, B. (2019). Stories of energy: Narrative in the energy humanities. Resilience: A Journal of the Environmental Humanities, 6(2–3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5250/resilience.6.2-3.0001
Gordijn, B., & ten Have, H. (2018). Science fiction and bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 21(3), 277–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9848-8
Guanio-Uluru, L. (2019). Climate fiction in Nordic landscapes: Lauren Groff’s Arcadia and Maja Lunde’s The History of Bees. Barnelitterært forskningstidsskrift, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2000-7493-2019-01-05
Guanio-Uluru, L. (2019). Imagining climate change: The representation of plants in three Nordic climate fictions for young adults. Children’s Literature in Education, 50, 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-019-09387-4
Haraway, D. J. (2013). SF: Science fiction, speculative fabulation, string figures, so far. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, 3. https://doi.org/10.7264/N3KH0K81
Haraway, D. J. (2015). Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6(1), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615934
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780
Harris, D. M. (2017). Telling the story of climate change: Geologic imagination, praxis, and policy. Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.027
Hermwille, L. (2016). The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions—Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.001
Hiday, C. (2021). Petrofiction as stasis in Abdelrahman Munif’s Cities of Salt and Joseph O’Neill’s Netherland. In Oil Fictions. Penn State University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271091877-016
Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2010). Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy, 39(4), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020
Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Bøe, V. (2025). Sustainable development: Notions, numbers, and narratives. Sustainable Development, 33(2), 2812–2825. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3261
Jameson, F. (1982). Progress versus utopia; or, can we imagine the future? Science Fiction Studies, 9(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1525/sfs.9.2.0147
Jarrahi, M. H., Newlands, G., Lee, M. K., Wolf, C. T., Kinder, E., & Sutherland, W. (2021). Algorithmic management in a work context. Big Data & Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211020332
Johns-Putra, A. (2016). Climate change in literature and literary studies: From cli-fi, climate change theater and ecopoetry to ecocriticism and climate change criticism. WIREs Climate Change, 7(2), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.385
Kabisch, S., Finnveden, G., Kratochvil, P., Sendi, R., Smagacz-Poziemska, M., Matos, R., & Bylund, J. (2019). New urban transitions towards sustainability: Addressing SDG challenges. Sustainability, 11(8), 2242. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082242
Kallis, G., Hickel, J., O'Neill, D. W., Jackson, T., Victor, P. A., Raworth, K., Schor, J. B., Steinberger, J. K., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2025). Post-growth: The science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries. The Lancet Planetary Health, 9(1), e62–e78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00310-3
Keller, C. (2023). Getting the first gig: Choice structures and digital sorting in platform-mediated labor markets. Digital Geography and Society, 5, 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2023.100067
Kemball, A. (2022). Biocolonial pregnancies: Louise Erdrich’s Future Home of the Living God (2017). Medical Humanities, 48(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2021-012250
Kendal, E. (2022). Science fiction in bioethics: A role for feminist narratology. Medical Humanities, 48(3), e12. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2021-012283
Koutsimpogiorgos, N., van Slageren, J., Herrmann, A. M., & Frenken, K. (2020). Conceptualizing the gig economy and its regulatory problems. Policy & Internet, 12(4), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.237
Lehdonvirta, V. (2018). Flexibility in the gig economy: Managing time on three online piecework platforms. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12102
Lestel, D., Bussolini, J., & Chrulew, M. (2014). The phenomenology of animal life. Environmental Humanities, 5(1), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615442
Levitas, R. (2013a). Utopia as method: The imaginary reconstitution of society. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314253
Levitas, R. (2013b). Utopia revised. In Utopia as Method: The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314253_6
Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
Macdonald, G. (2017). Monstrous transformer: Petrofiction and world literature. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 53(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2017.1337680
Mackenthun, G. (2021). Sustainable stories: Managing climate change with literature. Sustainability, 13(7), 4049. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074049
Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37(4), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004
Marland, P. (2013). Ecocriticism. Literature Compass, 10(11), 846–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.12105
McDaid, D., Andon, P., & Free, C. (2023). Algorithmic management and the politics of demand: Control and resistance at Uber. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 109, 101465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2023.101465
McDonald, P., Williams, P., & Mayes, R. (2021). How professional photographers engage with and resist digital platform work. New Media & Society, 23(6), 1602–1623. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820917905
Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
Mendonça, P., & Kougiannou, N. (2023). Disconnecting labour: Digital disconnection rights and platform work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 38(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12251
Milner, A. (2022). Viral science fiction: Five types of pandemic fiction. Extrapolation, 63(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2022.3
Miller, G., & McFarlane, A. (2016). Science fiction and the medical humanities. Medical Humanities, 42(4), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2016-011144
Mohai, P., Pellow, D., & Roberts, J. T. (2009). Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-082508-094348
Morgan, G. (2021). New ways: The pandemics of science fiction. Interface Focus, 11(6), 20210027. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2021.0027
Moylan, T. (2018a). Scraps of the untainted sky: Science fiction, utopia, dystopia. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429497407
Moylan, T. (2018b). The critical dystopia. In Scraps of the untainted sky: Science fiction, utopia, dystopia. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429497407-6
Mukherjee, U. P. (2021). Being fossil: Energy humanities 2.0. Études anglaises, 74(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.3917/etan.741.0003
Muldoon, J., & Raekstad, P. (2023). Algorithmic domination in the gig economy. European Journal of Political Theory, 22(4), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851221082078
Murray, S. (2022). Disability embodiment, speculative fiction, and the testbed of futurity. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 16, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2021.21
Nodelman, P. (1981). The cognitive estrangement of Darko Suvin. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 5(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1353/chq.0.1851
Ott, A. (2023). Utopia in environmental and sustainability education: Imagination, transformation, and transgression. Environmental Education Research, 29(5), 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2102583
Otter, C. (2025). The sensory Anthropocene. Environmental Humanities, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-11543463
Rodríguez Freire, R. (2025). Infrastructures of the Anthropocene. Environmental Humanities, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-11543511
Roduit, J., Eichinger, T., & Glannon, W. (2018). Science fiction and human enhancement: Radical life-extension in the movie In Time (2011). Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 21, 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9831-4
Rose, D. B., van Dooren, T., Chrulew, M., Cooke, S., Kearnes, M., & O'Gorman, E. (2012). Thinking through the environment, unsettling the humanities. Environmental Humanities, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3609940
Sarıkaya-Şen, M. (2023). From utopia to an eco-feminist critical dystopia: Diane Cook’s The New Wilderness. Women: A Cultural Review, 34(1–2), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2023.2184985
Schneider-Mayerson, M. (2018). The influence of climate fiction: An empirical survey of readers. Environmental Humanities, 10(2), 473–500. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-7156848
Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651
Sharifi, A., Allam, Z., Bibri, S. E., & Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R. (2024). Smart cities and sustainable development goals (SDGs): A systematic literature review of co-benefits and trade-offs. Cities, 146, 104659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104659
Sinha, N. (2023). Speculative fictions for decolonial futures. Studies in Social Justice, 17(3), 340–349. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v17i3.4385
Skrimshire, S. (2018). Confessing Anthropocene. Environmental Humanities, 10(1), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-4385589
Stableford, B. (2000). Biotechnology and utopia. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 3(2–3), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230008403320
Stefani, G., Biggeri, M., & Ferrone, L. (2022). Sustainable transitions narratives: An analysis of the literature through topic modelling. Sustainability, 14(4), 2085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042085
Strachan, C. G. (2016). Design, fiction and the medical humanities. Medical Humanities, 42(4), e15–e19. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2016-010934
Szeman, I. (2013). How to know about oil: Energy epistemologies and political futures. Journal of Canadian Studies, 47(3), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1353/jcs.2013.0020
Szeman, I. (2017). Conjectures on world energy literature: Or, what is petroculture? Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 53(3), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2017.1337672
Szeman, I. (2021). Conjectures on world energy literature. In Oil Fictions. Penn State University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271091877-015
Szeman, I., & Barney, D. (2021). Introduction: From solar to solarity. South Atlantic Quarterly, 120(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-8795656
Szeman, I., & Wellum, C. (2021). Energy humanities and the petroleumscape. In Oil Spaces. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367816049-16
van Dooren, T., & Rose, D. B. (2016). Lively ethnography: Storying animist worlds. Environmental Humanities, 8(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3527731
Vint, S. (2021). Biopolitical futures in twenty-first-century speculative fiction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108979382
Wald, P. (2008). Cognitive estrangement, science fiction, and medical ethics. Lancet, 371(9628), 1908–1909. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60821-1
Waldkirch, M., Bucher, E. L., Schou, P. K., & Grünwald, E. (2021). Controlled by the algorithm, coached by the crowd: How HRM activities take shape on digital work platforms in the gig economy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(12), 2643–2682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1914129
Webster, N. A., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Careers delivered from the kitchen? Immigrant women small-scale entrepreneurs working in the growing Nordic platform economy. NORA, 28(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2020.1714725
Wellum, C., Szeman, I., Johnson, B., Daggett, C., & Wenzel, J. (2025). Q&A: Energy humanities and American history. Modern American History, 8(3), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/mah.2025.10048
Wiener, M., Cram, W. A., & Benlian, A. (2023). Algorithmic control and gig workers: A legitimacy perspective of platform economy management. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(3), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1977729
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
Zhang, Y., Liu, C., & Wang, M. (2025). Utopia or dystopia? Measuring the effects of platform labour on workers: A literature overview. Sustainability, 17(23), 10830. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310830