The structure of Indonesian mimetic process: A natural semantic metalanguage analysis

Main Article Content

Siti Ayu Nurhidayati
Mulyadi
T. Thyrhaya Zein
Dardanila

Abstract

This research aims to describe Indonesian mimetic process, and its original meaning. This study used descriptive qualitative method. The data were collected through listening and recording techniques.  The findings obtained from this research are that Indonesian mimetic process verbs refer to the universal lexicon of word roots: HAPPEN and DO. The semantic structure of Indonesian mimetic process verbs has 1) event subtypes with event sub-subtypes (ups ‘keliru/mistaken’, nahhhh ‘setuju/agree’, cling...menjadi bagus/be good’, deruair yang meluap/overflowing water’, huuumembuat api membesar/make the fire bigger’, sstt... ‘rahasia/secret’, gemoymenggemaskan/adorable’, ohhhmenghibur diri/amuse yourself’) event subtype with bodily process subtypes (nyam nyamkenyang/full’, brrr...brrrsakit/pain’, wk wk `tertawa sinis/cynical laugh', zzzzbermimpi/dream’, nihkesal/annoyed’); 2) non-agentive movement subtype (cringmendapat gaji buta/got a blind salary’). Indonesian mimetic process verbs upskeliru/mistaken’, deru 'air yang meluap/overflowing water', huuumembuat api membesar/make the fire grow’ have purposive factors and no desirability.  Indonesian mimetic process verbs nahhhhsetuju/agree’, clingmenjadi bagus/be good’, stttrahasia/secret’, gemoy 'menggemaskan/adorable‘, ohhh 'menghibur diri/self-entertainment’, nyam-nyamkenyang/full’, wkwk 'tertawa sinis/laugh sarcastically', zzzzbermimpi/dream’, cringmendapat gaji buta/get a blind salary’ have purposive factors and no desire. The Indonesian mimetic process verb brrr...brrrsakit/pain’ has no purposive factor and desire.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurhidayati, S. A., Mulyadi, Zein, T. T., & Dardanila. (2025). The structure of Indonesian mimetic process: A natural semantic metalanguage analysis. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.58256/vsmp3142
Section
Literature, Linguistics & Criticism

How to Cite

Nurhidayati, S. A., Mulyadi, Zein, T. T., & Dardanila. (2025). The structure of Indonesian mimetic process: A natural semantic metalanguage analysis. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.58256/vsmp3142

Share

References

Akita, K. (2009). A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: Theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of Japanese mimetics.

Akita, K. (2016). Mimetics. Walter de Gruyter Inc.

Akita, K., & Pardeshi, P. (Eds.). (2019). Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives (Vol. 16). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.16

Andrason, A., & Heine, B. (2023). On the grammaticalization of ideophones. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Armoskaite, S., & Koskinen, P. (2017). Structuring sensory imagery: Ideophones across languages and cultures. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 62(2), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2017.12

Badenoch, N., & Choksi, N. (2021). Expressives in the South Asian Linguistic Area. BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004439153

Barrett, dkk. (2014). Introduction: Ideophones: Between Grammar and Poetry. Pragmatics and Society, Volume 5(Issue 3), 335–340.

Dingemanse, M. (2011). Ezra Pound among the Mawu: Ideophones and iconicity in Siwu. In P. Michelucci, O. Fischer, & C. Ljungberg (Eds.), Iconicity in Language and Literature (Vol. 10, pp. 39–54). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.10.03din

Dingemanse, M. (2012). Advances in the Cross‐Linguistic Study of Ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(10), 654–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.361

Dingemanse, M. (2017). Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF - Language Typology and Universals, 70(2), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2017-0018

Dingemanse, M. (2019). ‘Ideophone’ as a comparative concept. In K. Akita & P. Pardeshi (Eds.), Iconicity in Language and Literature (Vol. 16, pp. 13–34). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.16.02din

Drobnak, F. T. (2009). On the merits and shortcomings of semantic primes and natural semantic metalanguage in cross-cultural translation. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 6(1–2), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.6.1-2.29-41

Durst, U. (2003). The Natural Semantic Metalanguage approach to linguistic meaning. Theoretical Linguistics, 29(3), 157–200. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.29.3.157

Fitriana, I. (2021). Bangun Leksikon Mimetik Bahasa Jepang. Universitas Udayana Denpasar.

Goddard, C. (2012a). Semantic primes, semantic molecules, semantic templates: Key concepts in the NSM approach to lexical typology. Linguistics, 50(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0022

Goddard, C. (2012b). Semantic primes, semantic molecules, semantic templates: Key concepts in the NSM approach to lexical typology. Linguistics, 50(3), 711–743. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0022

Haiman, J. (2018). Ideophones and the Evolution of Language (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107706897

Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. (1995). Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. Cambridge University Press.

Langacker, R. W., & Chafe, W. L. (1972). Meaning and the Structure of Language. Language, 48(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.2307/412495

McLean, B. (2021). Revising an implicational hierarchy for the meanings of ideophones, with special reference to Japonic. Linguistic Typology, 25(3), 507–549. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2063

Michaelis, L. A. (2003). NSM and cognitive-functional models of grammar. Theoretical Linguistics, 29(3), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.29.3.275

Mulyadi. (1998). Struktur Semantis Verba Bahasa Indonesia [Master Thesis]. Universitas Udayana.

Mulyadi. (2009). Kategori dan Peran Semantis Verba dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Logat, 5(1), 56–65.

Mulyadi. (2012). Emotion Verbs in Bahasa Indonesia and Asahan Malay. E-Journal of Linguistics, 5, 1–19.

Mulyadi, Dardanila, & Yusuf, M. (2024). Emotive interjection in Asahan Malay language: A natural semantic metalanguage perspective. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(5), 2025172. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025172

Mulyadi, M., Yusuf, M., & Siregar, R. K. (2021). Verbal humor in selected Indonesian stand up comedian’s discourse: Semantic analysis using GVTH. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 8(1), 1943927. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1943927

Nuckolls, J. B. (1999). The Case for Sound Symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28(1), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.225

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa. Sanata Dharma University.

Sudipa, I. N. (2010). Struktur Semantik Verba Keadaan Bahasa. Universitas Udayana.

Sudipa, I. N., Kusuma, I. N. W., Sudipa, M. H. D., & Candra, K. D. P. (2021). Semantic structure of Balinese process verbs. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS4.1591

Sugiartini, N. W., Beratha, N. L. S., & Sudipa, I. N. (2023). Balinese Process Verbs in Lontar Usada Taru Pramana: A Natural Semantic Metalanguage Approach. International Journal of Research Publications, 128(1), 374–381. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1001281720235176

Sujianto, & Dahidi, A. (2004). Pengantar linguistik bahasa Jepang. Kesaint Blanc.

Thompson, A. L., & Do, Y. (2019). Defining iconicity: An articulation-based methodology for explaining the phonological structure of ideophones. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.872

Toratani, K. (2018). Particle drop of mimetics in Japanese: A Discourse Grammar approach. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 5(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00012.tor

Voeltz&Kilian-Hatz. (2008). Ideophones. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Wierzbicka, A. (2012). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford University Press.

Zhernokleyev, D. A. (2022). Mimetic Lives: Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, and Character in the Novel by Chloë Kitzinger. Slavonic and East European Review, 100(3), 535–537. https://doi.org/10.1353/see.2022.0043