The rhetoric of risk: A critical discourse analysis of 'food fraud' and public health
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present study uses Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to examine the formulation and application of the term "food fraud" across academic, regulatory, and media contexts. We argue that the debate around food fraud goes beyond a technical definition and often focuses on economic and trade problems, which makes it more challenging to achieve a broad public health and sustainability aim. It also analyzes language, framing, and institutional power to demonstrate how the discourse of "fraud" characterizes criminality, obscures structural issues, and overlooks fundamental deficiencies within the food system. We contend that recontextualizing food fraud within the framework of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—specifically SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions)—can elevate public health, environmental sustainability, and social equity in food safety governance.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
Abdul-Latif, E. (2011). Interdiscursivity between political and religious discourses in a speech by Sadat: Combining CDA and addressee rhetoric. Journal of Language and Politics, 10(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.10.1.03abd
Ayotte, K. J., Bernard, D. R., & O’Hair, H. D. (2020). Knowing terror: On the epistemology and rhetoric of risk. In Handbook of risk and crisis communication (pp. 607–628). Routledge.
Barnard, C., & O'Connor, N. (2017). Runners and riders: The horsemeat scandal, EU law and multi-level enforcement. The Cambridge Law Journal, 76(1), 116–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197317000153
Bielenia-Grajewska, M. (2015). Metaphors and risk cognition in the discourse on food-borne diseases. National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK385160/
Brooks, S., Elliott, C. T., Spence, M., Walsh, C., & Dean, M. (2017). Four years post-horsegate: An update of measures and actions put in place following the horsemeat incident of 2013. npj Science of Food, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-017-0007-z
Burgess, A. (2019). Environmental risk narratives in historical perspective: From early warnings to 'Risk Society' blame [PDF]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336918325
Carvalho, A. (2008). Media(ted) discourse and society: Rethinking the framework of critical discourse analysis. Journalism Studies, 9(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701848162
Casillas, S. M. (2018). Notes from the field: Multiple cyclosporiasis outbreaks—United States, 2018. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6732a4
Chang, A., Schulz, P. J., Jiao, W., Yu, G., & Yang, Y. (2022). Media source characteristics regarding food fraud misinformation according to the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) in China: Comparative study. JMIR Formative Research, 6(3), e32302. https://doi.org/10.2196/32302
Cruse, C. (2019). Food fraud and the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Bridging a disconnect. Food and Drug Law Journal, 74, 322–345.
Ehmke, M. D., Bonanno, A., Boys, K., & Smith, T. G. (2019). Food fraud: Economic insights into the dark side of incentives. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 63(4), 685–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12322
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002
Farrelly, M. (2020). Rethinking intertextuality in CDA. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(4), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1609535
Galloway, C., Ashwell, D., Croucher, S., & Diers-Lawson, A. R. (2019). Testing times: Communicating the role and uncertainty of analytical procedures in a food safety crisis [PDF]. https://www.organicresearchcentre.com/manage/authincludes/article_uploads/Testing%20times.pdf
Gee, J. P. (2017). Introducing discourse analysis: From grammar to society. Routledge.
Ghous, G. (2023). Intertextuality in the Pro-Left and Pro-Islamist Magazines in Pakistan: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 54–67.
Grabill, J. T., & Simmons, W. M. (1998). Toward a critical rhetoric of risk communication: Producing citizens and the role of technical communicators. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7(4), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572259809364639
Hook, D. (2001). Discourse, knowledge, materiality, history: Foucault and discourse analysis. Theory & Psychology, 11(4), 521–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354301114006
Jensen, R. E. (2015). Rhetoric of risk. In The SAGE handbook of risk communication (pp. 86–98). SAGE Publications.
Kendall, H., Clark, B., Rhymer, C., Kuznesof, S., Hajslova, J., Tomaniova, M., & Frewer, L. (2019). A systematic review of consumer perceptions of food fraud and authenticity: A European perspective. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 94, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.10.005
Kendall, H., Naughten, P., Kuznesof, S., Raley, M., Dean, M., Clark, B., Stolz, H., Home, R., Chang, M. Y., Zhong, Q., Brereton, P., & Frewer, L. J. (2018). Food fraud and the perceived integrity of European food imports into China [PDF]. https://www.fpe4all.org/admin/assets/reports/Report_Food_Fraud_Perceived_Integrity_European_Food_Imports_China_2018.pdf
Knezevic, I., Hunter, H., Watt, C., Williams, P., & Anderson, B. (2014). Food insecurity and participation: A critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 11(2), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.866591
Miller, S. (1990). Foucault on discourse and power. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 76, 115–125.
Moyer, D. C., DeVries, J. W., & Spink, J. (2017). The economics of a food fraud incident–Case studies and examples including Melamine in Wheat Gluten. Food Control, 71, 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.07.015
Niu, L., Chen, M., Chen, X., Wu, L., & Tsai, F. S. (2021). Enterprise food fraud in China: Key factors identification from social co-governance perspective. National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477971/
Oh, S. H. (2014). Am I in danger? Predictors and behavioral outcomes of public perception of risk associated with food hazards [Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University]. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dissertations/AAI3633504/
Schantz, P. M., & Tsang, V. C. (2003). The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and research and control of cysticercosis. Acta Tropica, 87(1), 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-706X(03)00061-3
Schneck, S. F. (1987). Michel Foucault on power/discourse, theory and practice. Human Studies, 10, 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142858
Stanciu, S. (2015). Horse meat consumption− between scandal and reality. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 697–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00471-5
Tola, A. (2018). Global food fraud trends and their mitigation strategies: The case of some dairy products: A review [PDF]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329784352
Tonkin, E., Coveney, J. D., Meyer, S. B., Wilson, A. M., & Webb, T. (2016). Managing uncertainty about food risks – Consumer use of food labelling. Appetite, 107, 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.015
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
van Ruth, S. M., Huisman, W., & Luning, P. A. (2017). Food fraud vulnerability and its key factors. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 67, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.06.017
Wardman, J., & Lofstedt, R. (2009). European Food Safety Authority - risk communication annual review [PDF]. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/corporate/pub/ar09
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). SAGE Publications.