The phenomenon of Arabic language absorption into Mandailing language: An autosegmental phonology analysis

Main Article Content

Rahlina Muskar
Rahimah
Khairawati

Abstract

Around the 7th-8th century AD, Arabic began to influence the Mandailing language when the influence of Arabic appeared together with the influence of Islam brought by Arab traders and preachers which resulted in language contact. In the 7th century, the Arabs had come to Indonesia to trade and mostly broadcast Islam. This study attempts to explore Arabic language absorption of words into the Mandailing language. This study employed qualitative approach. There are six (6) informants in this research. This study was conducted in Kotanopan, Panyabungan, and Padang Sidempuan city. From the analysis, it was found that the first phenomenon is that the absorbing language accepts foreign phonemes as they are without any changes. Then the second phenomenon is that the absorbing language makes phonological modifications to foreign phonemes and replaces them with the phonemes of the closest speakers of the absorbing language. The third phenomenon is a change by fully adjusting to the absorbing language. This research will provide knowledge for the community that many Arabic words are absorbed into Mandailing. This shows that there are features of Arabic compared to other foreign languages that can enrich the Mandailing language vocabulary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Muskar, R., Rahimah, & Khairawati. (2025). The phenomenon of Arabic language absorption into Mandailing language: An autosegmental phonology analysis. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.58256/8w5mvf49
Section
Literature, Linguistics & Criticism

How to Cite

Muskar, R., Rahimah, & Khairawati. (2025). The phenomenon of Arabic language absorption into Mandailing language: An autosegmental phonology analysis. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.58256/8w5mvf49

Share

References

Ahmad, Z. (2005). Phonology-Morphology Interface in Malay: An Optimality. Sydney: Australian National University.

Al Qarni, M. D. A., Syed Jaafar, S. R., & Hamdi, S. B. A. (2023). The Problematic of Arabic Emphatic & Guttural Segmental Sounds among Malay Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(5), Pages 1224-1238. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i5/16866

Ali Huddin, M. R., & Sapar, A. A. (2022). Phonological Fossilization of Arabic Pronunciation among Malays: A Review Article. EDUCATUM Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.37134/ejoss.vol8.1.12.2022

Amrulloh, M. A., & Humairo, L. (2020). Morpho-phonological of loanwords in Lampung language from Arabic. Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban, 7(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v7i1.13174

Aprillianti, L. (2018). Phonological Rules on Tamil Language Absorption into Bahasa Indonesia (Study of Transformational Generative Phonology). ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 9(2), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v9i2.2985

Bauer, L. (1988). What is lenition? Journal of Linguistics, 24(2), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670001183X

Bird, S., & Ladd, D. R. (1991). Presenting autosegmental phonology. Journal of Linguistics, 27(1), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012469

Blevins, J. (2006). New Perspectives on English Sound Patterns: “Natural” and “Unnatural” in Evolutionary Phonology. Journal of English Linguistics, 34(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424206287585

Chaiyanara, P. M. (2007). Pengenalan Teori Fonology (Introduction to Phonological Theory). Singapore: Dee Zed Consult Singapore.

Crowley, T. (1992). An introduction to historical linguistics. Auckland: Oxford University Press.

Cyran, E. (2008). Constant Clusters in Strong and Weak Positions. In J. Brandão de Carvalho, T. Scheer, & P. Ségéral (Eds.), Lenition and Fortition (pp. 447–482). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211443.3.447

Diani, I., & Azwandi, A. (2021). Phonological change processes of English and Indonesian. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 6(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v6i1.13642

Eckman, F. R., Elreyes, A., & Iverson, G. K. (2003). Some principles of second language phonology. Second Language Research, 19(3), 169–208. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658303sr2190a

Garrett, A., & Johnson, K. (2013). Phonetic bias in sound change. In A. C. L. Yu (Ed.), Origins of Sound Change (pp. 51–97). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0003

Hall, T. A. (2020). Phonological Processes in Germanic Languages. In M. T. Putnam & B. R. Page (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics (1st ed., pp. 11–32). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108378291.002

Harris, J., Urua, E.-A., & Tang, K. (2023). A unified model of lenition as modulation reduction: Gauging consonant strength in Ibibio. Phonology, 40(1–2), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267572400006X

Hasibuan, F. ani, Achiriah, & Solihah, T. S. (2023). The history of the development of Islam by Malim Salawet in Mandailing Natal in 1810-1870 A.D. Santhet (Jurnal Sejarah Pendidikan Dan Humaniora), 8(1), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.36526/santhet.v8i1.3257

Hosokawa, N. (2023). Loanwords and Japanese Identity: Inundating or Absorbed? (1st ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003197522

Kasman, R. (2021). Eksistensi pemerintah kabupaten menjaga nilai pendidikan Islam dengan menguatkan kebudayaan di Mandailing Natal. Edu Global : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.56874/eduglobal.v2i1.447

Kerswill, P. E. (1987). Levels of linguistic variation in Durham. Journal of Linguistics, 23(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011026

Lacheret-Dujour, A. (1989). Automatic generation of phonological variations. First European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1989), 2376–2379. ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/Eurospeech.1989-266

Laufer, B., & McLean, S. (2016). Loanwords and Vocabulary Size Test Scores: A Case of Different Estimates for Different L1 Learners. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(3), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1210611

Leben, W. R. (2018). Autosegmental Phonology. In W. R. Leben, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.365

Mardiana, Zurin, K., & Ulfa, M. (2024). Analisis kata serapan Bahasa Arab dalam tindak tutur masyarakat Melayu Bengkalis. AL-IMAM: Journal on Islamic Studies, Civilization and Learning Societies, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.58764/j.im.2024.5.52

Mawaridi, M. S., Mohamad Isa, A. A., & Hassan, L. (2024). Phonological Analysis of Syllabic Changes of Arabic Loan Verbs. E-Bangi Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 20(4), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2024.2104.10

McMahon, A. M. S. (1994). Understanding Language Change (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166591

Mndeme, A. S., & Ligembe, N. N. (2022). Phonological processes of Shambaa. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 7(3), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.73.8

Moeliono, A. M. (1985). Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. Jakarta: Penerbit Djambatan.

Mose, E. (2021). Phonological processes in Ekegusii borrowing: A constraint-based approach. JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching), 7(2), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v7i2.3233

Muassomah. (2023). From global language use to local meanings: Arabic to Indonesian absorption. IAS Journal of Localities, 1(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.62033/iasjol.v1i1.10

Munson, B. (2010). Levels of Phonological Abstraction and Knowledge of Socially Motivated Speech-Sound Variation: A Review, a Proposal, and a Commentary on the Papers by Clopper, Pierrehumbert, and Tamati, Drager, Foulkes, Mack, and Smith, Hall, and Munson. Laboratory Phonology, 1(1), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2010.008

Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Oshika, B., Zue, V., Weeks, R., Neu, H., & Aurbach, J. (1975). The role of phonological rules in speech understanding research. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 23(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1975.1162639

Pantu, A. (2014). Pengaruh bahasa Arab terhadap pengembangan bahasa Indonesia. ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam, 14(3), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v14i3.3154

Pulungan, A. (2008). Perkembangan Islam di Mandailing. Jakarta: Citapustaka Media Perintis.

Ramsammy, M. (2015). The Life Cycle of Phonological Processes: Accounting for Dialectal Microtypologies. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12102

Raphael, L. J., Dorman, M. F., Freeman, F., & Tobin, C. (1975). Vowel and Nasal Duration as Cues to Voicing in Word-Final Stop Consonants: Spectrographic and Perceptual Studies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18(3), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1803.389

Sagey, E. (1986). The Representation of Features and Relations in Nonlinear Phonology (Doctoral Dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.

Sawek, Y., & Muhibah, R. W. (2019). Absorption element of standard Malay word in Iban language and Sarawak Malay dialect. International Journal of Humanities, Philosophy and Language, 166–178. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijhpl.260014

Schoonheim, T. (2021). Words crossing borders. Lexicographica, 37(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1515/lex-2021-0009

Sen, R. (2016). Examining the life cycle of phonological processes: Considerations for historical research. Papers in Historical Phonology, 1(0), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.2218/pihph.1.2016.1691

Thomason, S.G. (2001). Language contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Ukhrawiyah, F. (2019). Perubahan Makna Kosakata bahasa Arab yang diserap ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Al-Ma‘rifah, 16(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.21009/almakrifah.16.02.03

van Heuven, V. J. (2008). Making sense of strange sounds: (Mutual) intelligibility of related language varieties. A review. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 2(1–2), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1753854809000305

Wisesty, U. N., Mubarok, M. S., & Adiwijaya. (2017). A classification of marked hijaiyah letters’ pronunciation using hidden Markov model. 020036. Surabaya, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4994439

Yaacob, S., Ghani, R. A., Bakar, R. A., Rahman, A. K. A., Ismail, T., & Adam, Z. (2014). Alternative Paradigm for Language Acquisition. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4(3), 465–469. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2014.43038

Yamauchi, N., Shinohara, K., & Tanaka, H. (2019). Crossmodal Association Between Linguistic Sounds and Motion Imagery: Voicing in Obstruents Connects With Different Strengths of Motor Execution. Perception, 48(6), 530–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619847577