Unraveling sentence complexities in reading comprehension passages: A deconstructive approach for competitive exams
Main Article Content
Abstract
Competitive exams serve as reliable and standardized assessment tools for entry into universities and workplaces alike. Beyond assessing language skills, they meticulously evaluate the ability to reason logically and analyze information. Reading comprehension plays a pivotal role in these exams since it evaluates the reasoning skills and language ability. Sentences in competitive exam reading comprehension passages are intentionally intricate to puzzle the readers. This paper advocates deconstruction of passages whereby the sentences are broken into parts to analyze the twists in the sentence structure, decipher the ambiguities, and comprehend them completely. It shows the results of an experimental study that involved a heterogeneous group of about eighty tertiary learners. They were trained to break the sentences, simplify the complications, interpret the meanings accurately, and answer the questions that follow. Passages and sentences from competitive exams such as the GRE, GMAT, GATE, IELTS, TOEFL, etc., are used to create real-time problem-solving scenarios. This intervention exposed the learners to several sentence styles and refined the structural awareness of the passages. Thereby, the learner improvements in performances were evaluated. It is evident that deconstruction and syntactic analyses have influenced the interpretation of the passage and enhanced accuracy.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
References:
Derrida, Jacques. Dissemination. A&C Black, 2004.
Derrida, J., 1978. Cogito and the History of Madness. From Writing and Difference. Trans. A. Bass. London & New York: Routledge. p. 75.
TW first, GRE General Test: RC-685773.Testbig, Test prep Communities testbig.com, 2017.
Educational Testing Service, The Official Guide to GRE, Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New Delhi, 2012.
Moats Louisa, LETRS: Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling, Sopris West Educational Services, 2005
Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sanabria, Ashley Adams et al. “A Reading Comprehension Intervention for Dual Language Learners With Weak Language and Reading Skills.” Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR (2022): 1-22.
Lervåg, Arne, and Vibeke Grøver Aukrust. “Vocabulary knowledge is a critical determinant of the difference in reading comprehension growth between first and second language learners.” Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines vol. 51,5 (2010): 612-20. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02185.x
E. Thorndike et al. "Reading as Reasoning: A Study of Mistakes in Paragraph Reading." (2009). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075325.
Reid Smith, Pamela Snow, Tanya Serry & Lorraine Hammond (2021) The Role of Background Knowledge in Reading Comprehension: A Critical Review, Reading Psychology, 42:3, 214-240, DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348
Shohamy, E. (1984). Does the testing method make a difference? The case of reading comprehension. Language Testing, 1, 147 - 170. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228400100203.
ETS. "Snapshot of the Individuals Who Took the GRE General Test: July 2016–June 2017." Educational Testing Service, 2017, www.ets.org/s/gre/pdf/snapshot_test_taker_data_2017.pdf.
PrepScholar GRE. "Average GRE Scores: Expert Analysis." PrepScholar, www.prepscholar.com/gre/blog/average-gre-scores. Accessed 19 June 2024.
Collegedunia. "GRE Percentiles: Check Section Wise GRE Percentile and Score Conversion." Collegedunia, collegedunia.com/exams/gre/percentile. Accessed 19 June 2024.
Kintsch, W., & Kintsch, E. (2005). Comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 71–92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chik, P. P.-M., Ho, C. S.-H., Yeung, P.-S., Luan, H., Lo, L.-Y., Chan, D. W.-O., et al. (2012a). Syntactic skills in sentence reading comprehension among Chinese elementary school children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(3), 679–699.
Yegen, C., & Abukan, M. (2014). Derrida and Language: Deconstruction. International Journal of Linguistics, 6, 37. https://doi.org/10.5296/IJL.V6I2.5210.
Schleifer, R. (1987). Deconstruction and Linguistic Analysis. College English. https://doi.org/10.2307/377849.
Stocker, B. (2006). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Derrida on Deconstruction. .
Elleman, A., & Oslund, E. (2019). Reading Comprehension Research: Implications for Practice and Policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 11 - 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218816339.
Trabasso, T. (1991). Comprehension Processes in Reading. Language and Speech, 34, 195 - 200. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099103400204.
Scott, C. (2009). A case for the sentence in reading comprehension.. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 40 2, 184-91 . https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2008/08-0042).
Perkins, K. (1983). Semantic Constructivity in ESL Reading Comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 19-27. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586421.
Cai, Y., & Yao, X. (2022). Teaching Complex Sentences in ESL Reading: Structural Analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v12n5p59.
Carrell, P. (1985). Facilitating ESL Reading by Teaching Text Structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 727-752. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586673.
Andoko, B., Hayashi, Y., & Hirashima, T. (2019). An Analysis of Concept Mapping Style in EFL Reading Comprehension from the Viewpoint of Paragraph Structure of Text. The Journal of Information and Systems in Education. https://doi.org/10.12937/ejsise.18.63.
Mohammad, Z., & Hasbi, M. (2021). Reading Difficulties in English as a Second Language in Grade Five at a Saint Patrick’s High School for Boys, Hyderabad- India. Arab World English Journal. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no4.34.
Gehlot, L., Al-Khalaf, H., & Gehlot, H. (2020). Evaluation of the reading habits of Indian students (reading aloud and reading silently) from low-, middle- and high-class schools. Educational Research Review, 15, 41-51. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2019.3760.
P, M., & Ghosh, A. (2012). Awareness of Reading Strategy Use of Indian ESL Students and the Relationship with Reading Comprehension Achievement. . https://doi.org/10.5539/ELT.V5N12P131.
Balasubramaniam, B. (2023). Reading Dysfluency in Indian Classrooms: An Insight. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.84.16.