Anaphora Relations in Lutsotso
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper examines anaphora relations in Lutsotso, a variety of the Oluluhyia language spoken in Western Kenya. Anaphora involves words or phrases referring to entities in discourse, essential for coherence in communication. Based on data from Lutsotso conversations and texts, the study identifies and classifies anaphoric elements, focusing on reflexives and reciprocals. Reflexive constructions in Lutsotso use morphemes like -i- or -eene- to indicate that two arguments in an action refer to the same entity. The reflexive marker -i- is a prefix positioned before the verb root. Additionally, reciprocals, marked by the pronoun -an, function as anaphoric elements in the language. This study of Lutsotso anaphora enhances understanding of linguistic structures, pragmatic principles, cross-linguistic variation, and cognitive processes in language.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC-SA) license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Asudeh, A. (2008). Anaphora and argument structure: Topics in the syntax and semantics of reflexives and reciprocals. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268441751.
Bauer, L. (2001). Morphological Productivity. Cambridge University Press.
Carlson, G. (2003). Anaphora: Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing.
Chomsky, N. (1981). “Lectures on Government and Binding (The Pisa Lectures)”.
J. Koster, and H. Van Riemsdijk (eds), Studies in Generative Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by Phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language (pp. 1-52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (6th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (Eds.) (2020). Ethnologue: Languages of the World. (Twenty-second edition). SIL International. Retrieved from http://www.ethnologue.com, 22-12-2020.
Fischer, S. (2015) Pronominal Anaphora. Volume 1, edited by Tibor Kiss and Artemis Alexiadou, Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2015, pp. 446-477. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377408.446
Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding Morphology. Oxford University Press.
Heine, B. (2000). “Polysemy involving reflexive and reciprocal markers in African languages”, in: Frajzingier Z. & Curl T. (2000b). Reflexives: Form and Function. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Levinson, S. C. (1987). Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics, 23(2), 379-434.
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. (2000). Reciprocals without Reflexives. In Frajzyngier, Z. & T. S. Curl (eds.), Reciprocals: Forms and Functions (pp. 30-62). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lutz, M. (2000). Agreement with conjoined noun phrases. Swahili Forum VII (=Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere, 64, 75-76.
Marlo, M. R. (2015). Exceptional Properties of the Reflexive in Bantu Languages. Nordic Journal of African Studies 24(1): 1-22.
Marten, & E.-M. B. Ström (Eds.), Current approaches to morphosyntactic variation in Bantu. London: Oxford University Press.
Odera, H. & Barasa, D. (2021). Aspectual forms in Lutsotso. Research Journal in Modern Languages and Literature, 2(2), 7-19. Modern Languages and Literatures, 2(2), 7-19. https://royalliteglobal.com/languages-and-literatures/article/view/579.
Odera, H., Barasa D., and Atichi A. (2021) Inflectional Forms of Tense in Lutsotso. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, vol. 4, no. 1, 2021, pp. 17-28, doi:10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.1.3.
Odera, H., Barasa, D., & Mudogo, B. (2025). Distribution of Anaphoric Elements in Lutsotso. Journal of Linguistics, Literary and Communication Studies, 4(1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.58721/jllcs.v4i1.970
Sikuku, J. (2011) Syntactic patterns of anaphoric relations in Lubukusu: Representation and interpretation in a minimalist perspective. University of Nairobi Dissertation.
Sikuku, J. (2013). Comparing Reflexive and Object marking in Lubukusu. Afranaph database.